Ted Hull Consulting FYI

Is Your Mission Worthwhile and How Would You Know?

September 21st, 2017

When a board develops its ends as it implements the Policy Governance® model, it considers three components. These components include: (1) how will people be better off, (2) which people will be better off and (3) what is it worth to produce these results. One of the challenges that the boards of not-for profits face in establishing ends is articulating what it is worth or what is often referred to as at what cost. It’s not just a matter of figuring out how much it will cost, but rather how valuable is it to the owners of the organizations to produce those results.

Let me bring it a little closer to home. You are contemplating buying a motorhome. It would allow your family to travel in comfort. Everything you need would be in the vehicle. Money would be saved by not buying restaurant meals and paying hotel bills, assuming you can find one when you want. There is no doubt your family would be better off with the motorhome. And now that you’ve done the research, you know that you can afford the model you have been looking at as well as the cost of operating it.

The question is how much better off will your family be in relation to the cost of the vehicle. One of the things you will need to consider is what you won’t do or have as a result of purchasing the motorhome. This is called the opportunity cost. As a result of the advantages to your family of having a motorhome, what will you be giving up? One of the costs which needs to be considered is what you won’t have because you have a motorhome. Because you have sunk your resources into a motorhome, you won’t be able to afford to rent a cabin at a fishing lodge in Canada or fly to a southern destination for ten days in the dead of winter. The cost of the motorhome includes the opportunity costs of other opportunities and amenities you must forgo.

Your board has pencilled in the intended results are for the intended demographic. It is confident that the revenue will be there to see the results accomplished. But in seeing those results accomplished, what other results won’t be achieved? A school might decide that it wants students to be academically prepared for admission into undergraduate science programs. It can afford the high end science labs which will be part of preparing its students. However in doing so, it can’t afford a second full size gym or a state-of-the-art music program.

To determine the at what cost component of the ends, includes careful consideration of values based on what your moral owners have communicated. Value is the result of looking at what the results are worth and what they will cost, including the cost of other results forgone.

  • The Challenges of the Reasonable Interpretation
May 19th, 2018
The "reasonable interpretation" concept in Policy Governance is often misunderstood. In this blog we take that concept and make it easily understood. In fact you use the concept much more often than you might fi.....
So Your Board Can Better Serve
204.898.6740

Ted Hull Consulting FYI

Is Your Mission Worthwhile and How Would You Know?

September 21st, 2017

When a board develops its ends as it implements the Policy Governance® model, it considers three components. These components include: (1) how will people be better off, (2) which people will be better off and (3) what is it worth to produce these results. One of the challenges that the boards of not-for profits face in establishing ends is articulating what it is worth or what is often referred to as at what cost. It’s not just a matter of figuring out how much it will cost, but rather how valuable is it to the owners of the organizations to produce those results.

Let me bring it a little closer to home. You are contemplating buying a motorhome. It would allow your family to travel in comfort. Everything you need would be in the vehicle. Money would be saved by not buying restaurant meals and paying hotel bills, assuming you can find one when you want. There is no doubt your family would be better off with the motorhome. And now that you’ve done the research, you know that you can afford the model you have been looking at as well as the cost of operating it.

The question is how much better off will your family be in relation to the cost of the vehicle. One of the things you will need to consider is what you won’t do or have as a result of purchasing the motorhome. This is called the opportunity cost. As a result of the advantages to your family of having a motorhome, what will you be giving up? One of the costs which needs to be considered is what you won’t have because you have a motorhome. Because you have sunk your resources into a motorhome, you won’t be able to afford to rent a cabin at a fishing lodge in Canada or fly to a southern destination for ten days in the dead of winter. The cost of the motorhome includes the opportunity costs of other opportunities and amenities you must forgo.

Your board has pencilled in the intended results are for the intended demographic. It is confident that the revenue will be there to see the results accomplished. But in seeing those results accomplished, what other results won’t be achieved? A school might decide that it wants students to be academically prepared for admission into undergraduate science programs. It can afford the high end science labs which will be part of preparing its students. However in doing so, it can’t afford a second full size gym or a state-of-the-art music program.

To determine the at what cost component of the ends, includes careful consideration of values based on what your moral owners have communicated. Value is the result of looking at what the results are worth and what they will cost, including the cost of other results forgone.

Ted Hull Consulting FYI


The Challenges of the Reasonable Interpretation
May 19th, 2018

Never Have a Policy that Includes
March 9th, 2018

Church Budgets Lead to Shortsightedness
January 17th, 2018

What a Board Approves, It Owns
November 1st, 2017

Kinda Using Policy Governance
October 5th, 2017

Is Your Mission Worthwhile and How Would You Know?
September 21st, 2017

What About Term Limits For Board Members
August 9th, 2017

Why Bother Evaluating Your CEO?
June 25th, 2017

Wisely Investing My Time
May 19th, 2017

Is Policy Governance Too Big For a Small Charity?
March 26th, 2017

Why Bother With Board Education? Video
January 5th, 2017

Board Priorities and Policy Governance
December 15th, 2016

Fishtailing is for Losers
September 19th, 2016

Ditch Your Board Executive Committee
August 25th, 2016

Personal Trainers Can Be Overrated
August 12th, 2016

The Difference Between Cost and Worth
April 25th, 2016

Policy Governance and the CEO Evaluation
March 12th, 2016

Two Sides of the Value Coin
February 12th, 2016

FYI - But a Church Board is Different...so Can Carver's Policy Governance® Model Work?
October 12th, 2015

FYI - Policy Goverance Isn't the Silver Bullet for a Church Board
July 21st, 2015

FYI - The Difference Between Owners and Consumers
June 24th, 2015

FYI - A Board is Greater Than the Sum of its Parts
May 18th, 2015

FYI - Policy Governance - A Whole New Game
April 28th, 2015

FYI - The Ten Drawbacks to Policy Governance
March 10th, 2015

FYI - The Features of Policy Governance
February 18th, 2015

FYI - Five Key Words For Effective Governance
January 6th, 2015



Primary Contact
272-3336 Portage Avenue
Winnipeg Manitoba
R3K 2H9
204.898.6740
  • The Challenges of the Reasonable Interpretation
May 19th, 2018
The "reasonable interpretation" concept in Policy Governance is often misunderstood. In this blog we take that concept and make it easily understood. In fact you use the concept much more often than you might first think. .....

Copyright Ted Hull Consulting All Rights Reserved | Developed and Hosted by M9 Corporation