Ted Hull Consulting FYI

Is Policy Governance Too Big For a Small Charity?

March 26th, 2017

I’ve heard boards say: The Carver Policy Governance model might be great for large organizations, but it’s too complicated for ours.

If you are one of those smaller charities or churches where the challenge of monitoring reports, developing reasonable interpretations and getting the data feels overwhelming, let’s chat.

First, let’s park Policy Governance®. Instead let me ask you some very fundamental questions. These questions, which are not intended to be rhetorical, need to be answered without consideration for spiritual or political correctness.

  • Do you deeply care if your charity contributes to making a difference in the lives of the people it is seeking to reach?
  • Are you clear what that difference would be?
  • Is there anything unethical, immoral or illegal that could take place in the context of the charity that you would consider unacceptable?
  • Do you know what those things are?
  • Do you want to be assured these things are not happening?

If you have answered no to any of the questions, then set those aside.

If you have answered yes to any of the questions, then you must have some method for finding out if what you value is being accomplished or adhered to. It is impossible to value something without knowing whether that value is being realized or compromised.

Here’s an example: I have a house rule telling my kids that they need to be home by midnight which reflects my care for my children and my responsibility as a parent. However, I never check my watch or stay awake long enough to see if they make it home on time. I’ve stated that I have a value, but my inattention to my kids and my watch strongly suggests otherwise.

In the same way, the board of a smaller charity has values about what difference the organization should make in the lives of certain people and what it is worth to produce those results. If the board really cares, then it will have a plan for making sure that the things it cares about are really taking place and those things which shouldn’t happen, aren’t happening.

So now you need a method of making sure that your values are reflected in the results produced by the organization and that there are no unacceptable activities or situations.

A far better process would be for the board to state in advance the things that are not allowed for the CEO – things that would put the organization at too much risk; then carefully monitor to ensure that boundary hasn’t been crossed. This frees the board to do its most important work – defining the future the organization should be creating. It also frees the CEO to actually do the work of making that future a reality.

  • What is it Worth for your Organization to Exist?
July 12th, 2018
.....
So Your Board Can Better Serve
204.898.6740

Ted Hull Consulting FYI

Is Policy Governance Too Big For a Small Charity?

March 26th, 2017

I’ve heard boards say: The Carver Policy Governance model might be great for large organizations, but it’s too complicated for ours.

If you are one of those smaller charities or churches where the challenge of monitoring reports, developing reasonable interpretations and getting the data feels overwhelming, let’s chat.

First, let’s park Policy Governance®. Instead let me ask you some very fundamental questions. These questions, which are not intended to be rhetorical, need to be answered without consideration for spiritual or political correctness.

  • Do you deeply care if your charity contributes to making a difference in the lives of the people it is seeking to reach?
  • Are you clear what that difference would be?
  • Is there anything unethical, immoral or illegal that could take place in the context of the charity that you would consider unacceptable?
  • Do you know what those things are?
  • Do you want to be assured these things are not happening?

If you have answered no to any of the questions, then set those aside.

If you have answered yes to any of the questions, then you must have some method for finding out if what you value is being accomplished or adhered to. It is impossible to value something without knowing whether that value is being realized or compromised.

Here’s an example: I have a house rule telling my kids that they need to be home by midnight which reflects my care for my children and my responsibility as a parent. However, I never check my watch or stay awake long enough to see if they make it home on time. I’ve stated that I have a value, but my inattention to my kids and my watch strongly suggests otherwise.

In the same way, the board of a smaller charity has values about what difference the organization should make in the lives of certain people and what it is worth to produce those results. If the board really cares, then it will have a plan for making sure that the things it cares about are really taking place and those things which shouldn’t happen, aren’t happening.

So now you need a method of making sure that your values are reflected in the results produced by the organization and that there are no unacceptable activities or situations.

A far better process would be for the board to state in advance the things that are not allowed for the CEO – things that would put the organization at too much risk; then carefully monitor to ensure that boundary hasn’t been crossed. This frees the board to do its most important work – defining the future the organization should be creating. It also frees the CEO to actually do the work of making that future a reality.

Ted Hull Consulting FYI


What is it Worth for your Organization to Exist?
July 12th, 2018

The Challenges of the Reasonable Interpretation
May 19th, 2018

Never Have a Policy that Includes
March 9th, 2018

Church Budgets Lead to Shortsightedness
January 17th, 2018

What a Board Approves, It Owns
November 1st, 2017

Kinda Using Policy Governance
October 5th, 2017

Is Your Mission Worthwhile and How Would You Know?
September 21st, 2017

What About Term Limits For Board Members
August 9th, 2017

Why Bother Evaluating Your CEO?
June 25th, 2017

Wisely Investing My Time
May 19th, 2017

Is Policy Governance Too Big For a Small Charity?
March 26th, 2017

Why Bother With Board Education? Video
January 5th, 2017

Board Priorities and Policy Governance
December 15th, 2016

Fishtailing is for Losers
September 19th, 2016

Ditch Your Board Executive Committee
August 25th, 2016

Personal Trainers Can Be Overrated
August 12th, 2016

The Difference Between Cost and Worth
April 25th, 2016

Policy Governance and the CEO Evaluation
March 12th, 2016

Two Sides of the Value Coin
February 12th, 2016

FYI - But a Church Board is Different...so Can Carver's Policy Governance® Model Work?
October 12th, 2015

FYI - Policy Goverance Isn't the Silver Bullet for a Church Board
July 21st, 2015

FYI - The Difference Between Owners and Consumers
June 24th, 2015

FYI - A Board is Greater Than the Sum of its Parts
May 18th, 2015

FYI - Policy Governance - A Whole New Game
April 28th, 2015

FYI - The Ten Drawbacks to Policy Governance
March 10th, 2015

FYI - The Features of Policy Governance
February 18th, 2015

FYI - Five Key Words For Effective Governance
January 6th, 2015



Primary Contact
272-3336 Portage Avenue
Winnipeg Manitoba
R3K 2H9
204.898.6740
  • What is it Worth for your Organization to Exist?
July 12th, 2018
.....

Copyright Ted Hull Consulting All Rights Reserved | Developed and Hosted by M9 Corporation